This lesson teaches how to structure vague or non-standard prompts without forcing a canned framework.
At stronger performance levels, case prompts become less tidy.
Instead of:
you may get something like:
These prompts test whether you can create order without relying on memorized labels.
Advanced structuring starts by defining the real decision before building the structure.
In ambiguous cases, the structure is not just a breakdown of drivers.
It is also a way of framing the problem space.
That usually means answering:
Strong candidates impose useful logic without pretending the prompt is more precise than it is.
When the prompt is vague, do not rush to name a framework.
First narrow the problem.
Then choose a structure that is useful for this decision, even if it borrows selectively from multiple classic models.
Determine whether the case is about:
Possible lenses include:
Use branches that help answer the decision rather than branches that simply sound familiar.
Ambiguous cases become manageable only when you decide what matters most first.
As facts emerge, your structure may need to become more specific.
Prompt:
"Our client wants to rethink growth."
A weak response:
"I’d like to use a growth framework with customers, products, and markets."
A stronger response:
"Before structuring this, I’d clarify whether the issue is that growth has stalled, growth quality is poor, or the client is deciding among new growth paths. My initial lens would be current growth performance, available growth options, and the client’s right to win in each, because that should tell us whether the answer is fixing the core business or expanding into something new."
That sounds adaptive rather than memorized.
A strong candidate:
A weaker candidate often:
If the case is ambiguous, your structure should acknowledge that.
The interviewer cares more about the reasoning than the name.
A structure built under ambiguity should evolve when better information appears.
How would you structure this prompt: "A consumer company feels it is losing relevance"? Focus first on the decision, not the framework name.
"I’d first clarify whether the issue is declining demand, weaker competitive position, or uncertainty about where future growth should come from. Given the ambiguity, I’d initially structure the problem into three areas: what is happening in the core business, what customer or competitive shifts may explain it, and what strategic responses are realistically available to the client. That would let me determine whether the answer is repair, reposition, or expansion."
Unlock access to all platform features, including cases, CV review, and 1:1 consultant bookings